中国上市互联网金融企业合法化战略研究——基于组织印记和制度创业视角

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 创新是企业生存之本,获得市场认可的创新成为企业可持续发展的驱动力量。基于组织印记和制度创业视角,对中国上市互联网金融企业合法化战略选择及其影响因素与绩效的关系进行研究,构建了“组织印记-合法化战略-绩效”的理论模型。通过收集企业经营数据、对权威媒体报道进行内容分析等方法获取了111家中国上市互联网金融企业2014—2017年的数据,运用面板数据的多元回归分析等方法进行实证检验。研究发现:行业经验对合法化战略和企业绩效有正向影响,且合法化战略,即依从型和操纵型战略具有部分中介作用;法律环境负向调节行业经验与绩效以及依从型战略与绩效的关系。将组织印记、企业合法化战略及组织绩效联系起来,延伸了对组织合法性这一制度理论核心议题的研究,强调了历史意识对探究组织变革的意义,也为中国互联网金融实践提供了理论指导。

关键词: 组织印记, 制度创业, 合法化战略, 互联网金融企业

Abstract: Innovation is the foundation of enterprises’ survival, and innovations accepted by theh market has become a driving force for sustainable development. Form the theoretical perspectives of organizational imprinting and institutional entrepreneurship, this paper analyzes the factors affecting the legitimation strategy of Chinese listed Internet finance enterprises, explores the relationship between legitimation strategic choice and performance. We collect business data and conduct a content analysis of authoritative media reports of 111 Chinese listed Internet finance enterprises from 2014 to 2017, and test all the hypotheses by multiple regression analysis of panel data. The findings show that industry experience has a significant positive impact on legitimation strategy and corporate performance; legitimation strategies, i.e., the conformance strategy and manipulation strategy, play a partial mediating role; and legal environment negatively moderates the relationship between industry experience and performance, and between conformance strategy and performance. By integrating organizational imprinting, legitimation strategy and organizational performance, this paper not only extends the research on organizational legitimacy as the core issue of institutional theory, but also emphasizes the significance of historical consciousness in exploring organizational change. Besides, this paper provides theoretical guidance for the practice of Internet finance in China.

Key words: organizational imprinting, institutional entrepreneurship, legitimation strategy, Internet finance enterprises

朱蓉, 曹丽卿, 赵佳鑫. 中国上市互联网金融企业合法化战略研究——基于组织印记和制度创业视角[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(10): 235-244.

Zhu Rong, Cao Liqing, Zhao Jiaxin. A Study on the Legitimation Strategy of Listed Internet Finance Enterprises in China——From the Perspectives of Organizational Imprinting and Institutional Entrepreneurship[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(10): 235-244.

参考文献

[1] Li Y., Guo H., Liu Y., et al. Incentive Mechanisms, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Technology Commercialization:Evidence from China's Transitional Economy[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2008,25(1):63-78;
[2] Demirgüç-Kunt A., Klapper L., Singer D., et al. 2017 the Global Findex Database:Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution[R]. World Bank Group, 2018;
[3] Suchman M. C. Managing Legitimacy:Strategic and Institutional Approaches[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(3):571-610;
[4] 高照军,张宏如,蒋耘莛. 制度合法性距离、二次创新与开放式创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(3):47-59;
[5] Fisher G., Kuratko D. F., Bloodgood J. M., et al. Legitimate to Whom? The Challenge of Audience Diversity and New Venture Legitimacy[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2017,32(1):52-71;
[6] Marquis C., Tilcsik A. Imprinting:Toward a Multilevel Theory[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2013,7(1):195-245;
[7] 蔡宁,贺锦江,王节祥. "互联网+"背景下的制度压力与企业创业战略选择——基于滴滴出行平台的案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017,(3):174-192;
[8] 魏丽萍,陈德棉,谢胜强. 互联网金融投资决策:金融素养、风险容忍和风险感知的共同影响[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(9):61-71;
[9] 徐二明,肖建强,李维光. 创业中的合法性阈值跨越过程研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018,15(4):475-484;
[10] Snihur Y., Zott C. The Genesis and Metamorphosis of Novelty Imprints:How Business Model Innovation Emerges in Young Ventures[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2020,63(2):554-583;
[11] Battilana J., Leca B., Boxenbaum E. How Actors Change Institutions:Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2009,3(1):65-107;
[12] Dobrev S. D., Gotsopoulos A. Legitimacy Vacuum, Structural Imprinting, and the First Mover Disadvantage[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010,53(5):1153-1174;
[13] Baron J. N., Hannan M. T., Burton M. D. Building the Iron Cage:Determinants of Managerial Intensity in the Early Years of Organizations[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1999,64(4):527-547;
[14] Battilana J., Sengul M., Pache A. C., et al. Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations:The Case of Work Integration Social Enterprises[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015,58(6):1658-1685;
[15] Kotha R., George G. Friends, Family, or Fools:Entrepreneur Experience and Its Implications for Equity Distribution and Resource Mobilization[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012,27(5):525-543;
[16] 杨俊,薛红志,牛芳. 先前工作经验、创业机会与新技术企业绩效——一个交互效应模型及启示[J]. 管理学报, 2011,8(1):116-125;
[17] 朱蓉,曹丽卿. 组织印记视角的P2P创业者行业经验与可持续发展关系研究[J]. 金融发展研究, 2017,(4):42-46;
[18] 朱蓉,曹丽卿. 创业企业组织印记的来源、蛹变与绩效——以京东集团为例[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2018,11(5):502-518;
[19] 李宏贵,周洁. 组织声誉与企业成长:创新合法性的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015,32(10):84-87;
[20] 俞园园,梅强. 组织合法性中介作用下的产业集群关系嵌入对新创企业绩效的影响[J]. 管理学报, 2016,13(5):697-706;
[21] 裴梦丹,张宝建,孙国强. 关系冗余、组织合法性与新创企业绩效关系研究[J]. 软科学, 2019,33(1):64-67;
[22] Deephouse D. L. Does Isomorphism Legitimate[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(4):1024-1039;
[23] Oliver C. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991,16(1):145-179;
[24] Zimmerman M. A., Zeitz G. J. Beyond Survival:Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002,27(3):414-431;
[25] 杜运周,张玉利. 稳健合法化战略与创新市场化整合研究——一个综合模型[J]. 科学管理研究, 2008,26(4):14-17;
[26] 汤淑琴,蔡莉,陈娟艺,等. 经验学习对新企业绩效的动态影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2015,12(8):1154-1162;
[27] Crossland C., Zyung J., Hiller N. J., et al. CEO Career Variety:Effects on Firm-Level Strategic and Social Novelty[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014,57(3):652-674;
[28] Simsek Z., Fox B. C., Heavey C. "What's Past Is Prologue":A Framework, Review, and Future Directions for Organizational Research on Imprinting[J]. Journal of Management, 2015,41(1):288-317;
[29] Guillen M. Business Groups in Emerging Economies:A Resource-Based View[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000,43(3):362-380;
[30] Karadaǧ H. A Comparative Analysis on the Relationship between Institutional Environment and Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies[J]. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 2018,31(9):75-105;
[31] Covin J. G., Green K. M., Slevin D. P. Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation-Sales Growth Rate Relationship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2006,30(1):57-81;
[32] Zahra S. A. Technology Strategy and Financial Performance:Examining the Moderating Role of the Firm's Competitive Environment[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1996,11(3):189-219;
[33] Li H., Zhang Y. The Role of Managers' Political Networking and Functional Experience in New Venture Performance:Evidence from China's Transition Economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007,28(8):791-804;
[34] Wei Y. Organizational Imprinting and Response to Institutional Complexity:Evidence from Publicly-Traded Chinese State-Owned Firms in Hong Kong[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2017,13(2):345-373;
[35] 高辉,邹国庆. 制度理论与高阶理论整合视角下创业制度环境如何影响企业创新绩效[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019,36(2):69-76;
[36] Covin J. G., Slevin D. P. Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989,10(1):75-87;
[37] Stuart T., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(2):315-349;
[38] Bucar B. The Mediating Role of Organizational Legitimacy in Resource-Based Models of Firm Performance[D]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Marketing and Policy Studies, Case Western Reserve University, 2004;
[39] 左美云. 互联网金融的未来:四个重要发展方向[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2017,(3):52-60;
[40] Tilcsik A. Remembrance of Things Past:Individual Imprinting in Organizations[J]. Review of Income and Wealth, 2012,52(2):327-340;
[41] Ahlstrom D., Bruton G. D. Learning from Successful Local Private Firms in China:Establishing Legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 2001,15(4):72-83;
[42] Scott W. R. Unpacking Institutional Arguments[A]. In Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis[C]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1991;
[43] 吴月瑞. 企业合法化战略与创新绩效关系的实证研究——基于内部冗余和外部环境的权变作用[D]. 华南理工大学博士学位论文, 2011;
[44] 王冲. 公司跨界创业的战略选择研究——基于合法性与资源配置的双重视角[D]. 吉林大学博士学位论文, 2016;
[45] 李雪灵,魏骏巍,万妮娜. 制度距离对跨国企业合法化战略选择的影响——基于中国跨国企业的实证研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2019,38(4):109-115;
[46] DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Field[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983,48(2):147-160;
[47] Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations:The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983,28(1):22-39;
[48] 万妮娜. 制度距离、进入模式与跨国企业合法化战略选择研究[D]. 吉林大学博士学位论文, 2016;
[49] 焦豪. 双元型组织竞争优势的构建路径:基于动态能力理论的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2011,(11):76-91;
[50] 陈永霞,贾良定,李超平,等. 变革型领导、心理授权与员工的组织承诺:中国情景下的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2006, (1):96-105;
[51] 王小鲁,樊纲,余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016年)[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2017;
[52] 温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004,36(5):614-620;
[53] Suddaby R., Foster W. M. History and Organizational Change[J]. Journal of Management, 2017,43(1):19-38;
[54] Atkinson R. D., Lind M. Big Is Beautiful:Debunking the Myth of Small Business[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press, 2018;
[55] Schumacher D. Small Is Beautiful in the 21st Century:The Legacy of E.F. Schumacher[M]. Totnes:Green Books, 2011;
[56] DeTienne D. R. Entrepreneurial Exit as a Critical Component of the Entrepreneurial Process:Theoretical Development[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2010,25(2):203-215;
[57] 何天文. 量子时代的组织与领导力——专访"量子管理"奠基人丹娜·左哈尔[J]. 清华管理评论, 2018,(12):6-10