东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地系统耦合研究

管理评论 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 83-94.

东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地系统耦合研究

李存芳^1,2, 王梅玲^1,2, 张晓旭³, 杜沈悦^1,2, 张博^1,2

1. 江苏师范大学商学院, 徐州 221116;
2. 江苏师范大学产业经济与企业组织研究中心, 徐州 221116;
3. 江苏省徐州财经高等职业技术学校, 徐州 221008

收稿日期:2017-10-11 出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2020-11-07
作者简介:李存芳,江苏师范大学商学院教授,博士生导师,博士;王梅玲,江苏师范大学商学院讲师,博士;张晓旭,江苏省徐州财经高等职业技术学校助教,硕士;杜沈悦,江苏师范大学商学院硕士研究生;张博,江苏师范大学商学院硕士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（72074102；71573110）；江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目（KYCX20-2393）。

System Coupling Study between East Resources-based Enterprises and West Resource-rich Land

Li Cunfang^1,2, Wang Meiling^1,2, Zhang Xiaoxu³, Du Shenyue^1,2, Zhang Bo^1,2

1. Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116;
2. Center for Industrial Economy and Enterprise Organization, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116;
3. Xuzhou Financial Higher Vocational and Technical School in Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221008

Received:2017-10-11 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2020-11-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对我国东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地的系统耦合问题，采取系统工程学和协同学的思想，深度分析双方的优势要素耦合关系，构建系统耦合度模型和判别准则，选取徐州矿务集团和天能徐州煤电集团分别与新疆维吾尔自治区、贵州省、青海省、陕西省2005—2014年的相关指标数据样本，运用主成分分析、灰色斜率关联分析等方法进行实证检验。研究表明：（1）东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地双方优势要素的耦合正是东部资源型企业跨区转移行为的本质。（2）东部资源型企业跨区转移行为的实现取决于东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地双方优势要素的耦合度。（3）东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地双方优势要素耦合度的高低可以作为企业跨区转移目标地选择的科学依据。徐州矿务集团、天能徐州煤电集团与新疆维吾尔自治区的系统耦合度分别高于其与贵州省、青海省、陕西省的系统耦合度，可以优先选择向新疆维吾尔自治区转移。（4）东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地双方均应高度重视自身条件短板的补足，以提高系统耦合度，强化企业跨区转移行为的驱动力。研究结论可为调控资源型企业跨区转移行为和促进区域创新协调发展的相关政策制定提供理论依据和实践支持。

关键词: 资源型企业, 西部资源富集地, 优势要素, 耦合关系, 系统耦合度

Abstract: According to the system coupling between east resources-based enterprises and west resource-rich land, this paper analyses coupling relationship of both sides advantage factors in depth, establishes system coupling model and judge principles on the basis of system engineer and synergy science. The paper also studies the data of Xuzhou Mining Group, Day Xuzhou Coal and Electricity Group, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Guizhou Province, Qinghai Province, Shanxi Province from 2005 to 2014 that are selected to do empirical test by principal component analysis and gray slope correlation analysis. The research reaches the following conclusion. First, the coupling between east resources-based enterprises and west resource-rich land is the essence of cross-regional transfer behavior in resource-based enterprises. Second, the realization of cross-regional transfer behavior in east resources-based enterprises depends on the degree of coupling between the east resources-based enterprises and west resource-rich land. Third, the level of coupling degree in east resources-based enterprises and west resource-rich land can be used as a scientific basis for choosing the trans-regional transfer destination. The coupling degree between Xuzhou Mining Group, Day Xuzhou Coal and Electricity Group and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region is higher than that between them and Guizhou Province, Qinghai Province, Shanxi Province, so transferring to Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region can be preferentially selected. Fourth, both resources-based enterprises and west resource-rich land should attach great importance to overcoming their own shortcomings in order to further improve the system coupling and strengthen the driving force of cross-regional transfer behavior. The conclusions can provide theoretical basis and practical support for regulating the cross-regional transfer behavior of resource-based enterprises and promoting the coordinated development of regional innovation.

Key words: resources-based enterprises, west resource-rich land, advantage factors, coupling relationship, system coupling factor

李存芳, 王梅玲, 张晓旭, 杜沈悦, 张博. 东部资源型企业与西部资源富集地系统耦合研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(10): 83-94.

Li Cunfang, Wang Meiling, Zhang Xiaoxu, Du Shenyue, Zhang Bo. System Coupling Study between East Resources-based Enterprises and West Resource-rich Land[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(10): 83-94.

参考文献

[1] 李存芳,董梅,王青,等. 资源枯竭型企业跨区转移行为外溢效应与胁迫效应的研究进展[J]. 经济地理, 2017,37(3):106-112
[2] Zhang H. M., Zhou D. Q., Cao J. A Quantitive Analysis on Energy Strategy Evolution in China and US[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011,15(1):886-890
[3] Saxenian A. Regional Advantage:Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1996
[4] 李凯,李世杰. 装备制造业集群耦合结构:一个产业集群研究的新视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2005,(2):51-57
[5] 吕涛,聂锐,刘玥. 西部能源开发利用中的产业联动战略研究[J]. 资源科学, 2010,32(7):1236-1244
[6] 杨萍,王婷婷. 资源型城镇基于产业共生开展循环经济的问题研究——以昆明东川区为例[J]. 经济问题探索, 2011,(4):126-130
[7] Long R. Y., Chen H., Li H. J., et al. Selecting Alternative Industries for Chinese Resource-Based Cities:Based on Intraregional and Interregional Comparative Advantages[J]. Energy Policy, 2013,57(6):82-88
[8] 王卉彤,刘靖,雷丹. 新旧两类产业耦合发展过程中的科技金融功能定位研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014,(2):178-179
[9] 霍影,霍金刚. 煤炭洁净转化产业与战略性新兴产业耦合发展路径研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2016,25(8):38-42
[10] Ward F. A., Michelsen A. M. The Economic Value of Water in Agriculture:Concepts and Policy Applications[J]. Water Policy, 2002,4(5):423-446
[11] Li Y. F., Li Y., Zhou Y., et al. Investigation of a Coupling Model of Coordination between Urbanization and the Environment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012,98(1):127-133
[12] 赵丽平,李邦熹,王雅鹏,等. 城镇化与粮食生产水土资源的时空耦合协调[J]. 经济地理, 2016,36(10):146-152
[13] Annez P., Buckley R., Kalarickal J. African Urbanization as Flight?Some Policy Implications of Geography[J]. Urban Forum, 2010,21(3):221-234
[14] Srinivasan V., Seto K. C., Emerson R., et al. The Impact of Urbanization on Water Vulnerability:A Coupled Human-environment System Approach for Chennai, India[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013,23(1):229-239
[15] Singh P., Sulaiman O., Hashim R., et al. Using Biomass Residues from Oil Palm Industry as a Raw Material for Pulp and Paper Industry:Potential Benefits and Threat to the Environment[J]. Environment Development & Sustainability, 2013,15(2):367-383
[16] Bian Z. F., Lu Q. Q. Ecological Effects Analysis of Land Use Change in Coal Mining Area Based on Ecosystem Service Valuing:A Case Study in Jiawang[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013,68(6):1619-1630
[17] Bohac J., Lipton J. Environmental Impact of the Coal Industry and Resource Equivalency Method for Environmental Damage with Ecological Indicators[J]. Springer Netherlands, 2015,33(4):176-179
[18] 王慧,丁忠义,贾斐斐,等. 煤矿区煤炭资源与土地资源协调利用耦合关系研究——以沛北煤矿区张双楼矿为例[J]. 中国矿业, 2016,25(11):93-98
[19] Obidzinski K., Dermawan A. Pulp Industry and Environment in Indonesia:Is There Sustainable Future?[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2012,12(4):961-966
[20] Day J., Cai L. P. Environmental and Energy-related Challenges to Sustainable Tourism in the United States and China[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2012,19(5):379-388
[21] Norgaard R. B., Pascual U., Corbera E., et al. Ecosystem Services:From Eye-opening Metaphor to Complexity Blinder[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(6):1219-1227
[22] Mills A., Phadke A., Wiser R. Exploration of Resource and Transmission Expansion Decisions in the Western Renewable Energy Zone Initiative[J]. Energy Policy, 2011,39(3):1732-1745
[23] 李存芳,周德群,杨保华. 中国可耗竭资源型企业转移行为的特征和趋势[J]. 管理评论, 2012,24(3):150-156
[24] Dong S. C., Li Z. H., Li Y., et al. Resources, Environment and Economic Atterns and Sustainable Development Modes of the Silk Road Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015,6(2):65-72
[25] 黄亮雄,钱馨蓓,隋广军. 中国对外直接投资改善了"一带一路"沿线国家的基础设施水平吗?[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(3):226-239
[26] 吴大进,曹力,陈立华. 协同学原理和应用[M]. 武汉:华中理工大学出版社, 1990
[27] 刘思峰,杨英杰,吴利丰,等. 灰色系统理论及其应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2015
[28] 董沛武,张雪舟. 林业产业与森林生态系统耦合度测度研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2013,(11):178-184