基于扎根理论的团队追随研究：内涵、结构与形成机制

›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 147-160.

• 组织行为与人力资源管理 • 上一篇下一篇

基于扎根理论的团队追随研究：内涵、结构与形成机制

曹元坤¹, 张倩^1,2, 祝振兵^1,3, 张龙⁴

1 江西财经大学产业集群与企业发展研究中心, 南昌 330013;
2 江西中医药大学经济与管理学院, 南昌 330004;
3 江西理工大学商学院, 南昌 330013;
4 湖南大学工商管理学院, 长沙 410082

收稿日期:2018-09-20 出版日期:2019-11-28 发布日期:2019-11-30
通讯作者: 祝振兵,江西财经大学产业集群与企业发展研究中心博士后,江西理工大学商学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士
作者简介:曹元坤,江西财经大学产业集群与企业发展研究中心教授,博士生导师,博士;张倩,江西财经大学工商管理学院博士研究生,江西中医药大学经济与管理学院讲师;张龙,湖南大学工商管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71562018，71802077）；江西省自然科学基金项目（20171BAA208011）；江西省研究生创新专项资金项目（YC2016-B041）；中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2018M642585）。

A Research on Team Followership Based on Grounded Theory: Definition, Structure and Formation Mechanism

Cao Yuankun¹, Zhang Qian^1,2, Zhu Zhenbing^1,3, Zhang Long⁴

1 Research Center of Cluster and Enterprise Development, Jiangxi University of Finance & Economics, Nanchang 330013;
2 School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330004;
3 School of Management, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013;
4 Business School of Hunan University, Changsha 410082

Received:2018-09-20 Online:2019-11-28 Published:2019-11-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前追随力研究主要聚焦于组织中个体追随，而忽视了对团队追随的探索。基于实践的观察及理论发展的趋势，相对于个体追随，工作中的团队追随具有更高的研究及实践价值。鉴于此，本文首先提出了团队追随的概念，并从工作团队视角，基于扎根理论深入探究了团队追随的内涵和结构，发现其包含团队任务导向和人际促进导向两个维度，前者指团队追随是一种积极的角色内行为，后者指团队追随包含了团队成员与领导者的情感交流。在维度确立的基础上，本文进一步提出团队追随归类模型和团队追随形成路径模型。最后，对于研究中存在的不足以及团队追随未来的研究方向进行了分析和展望。

关键词: 追随力, 团队追随, 扎根理论

Abstract:

The existing researches on followership mainly focus on characteristics of the individual level, but neglect the characteristics of the team level. Based on practical observations and the trend of theoretical development, this paper proposes that the role of work team collective followership is more prominent in the leadership process compared to individual followership. Thus, we put forward a concept of team followership and explore its connotation and structure based on grounded theory methodology. The result shows that team followership includes both dimensions of team task orientation and interpersonal facilitation orientation, of which the former means team followership is an active in-role behaviors within followers and the latter means team followership involves emotional communication with the leader. Then, the classification model on work team collective followership is proposed on basis of the aforesaid discussion. In addition, we also explore the formation mechanism of team followership. The deficiencies of this paper and future research directions of team followership are discussed.

Key words: followership, team followership, grounded theory

曹元坤, 张倩, 祝振兵, 张龙. 基于扎根理论的团队追随研究：内涵、结构与形成机制[J]. , 2019, 31(11): 147-160.

Cao Yuankun, Zhang Qian, Zhu Zhenbing, Zhang Long. A Research on Team Followership Based on Grounded Theory: Definition, Structure and Formation Mechanism[J]. , 2019, 31(11): 147-160.

参考文献

[1] Martin A., Bal V. The State of Teams:CCL Research Report[R]. Center for Creative Leadership, 2006
[2] Zaccro S. J., Rittman A. L., Marks M. A. Team Leadership[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2001,12(4):451-483
[3] 李超平.变革型领导与团队效能:团队内合作的跨层中介作用[J].管理评论, 2014,26(4):73-81
[4] Uhl-Bien M., Ronald R. E., Lowe K. B., et al. Followership Theory:A Review and Research Agenda[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014,25(11):83-104
[5] 宋继文,郭一蓉,徐大海,等.追随力视角下积极挑战行为的概念与作用机制研究[J].管理学报, 2017,14(10):1445-1455
[6] Leroy H., Anseel F., Gardner W. L., et al. Authentic Leadership, Authentic Followership, Basic Need Satisfaction and Work Role Performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2015,41(6):1677-1697
[7] Carsten M. K., Uhl-Bien M. Follower Beliefs in The Co-production of Leadership[J]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 2012,220(4):210-220
[8] 曹元坤,祝振兵.内隐追随理论:概念、测量、前因及后果[J].心理科学进展, 2015,23(2):280-288
[9] 王弘钰,李云剑.员工联产信念与建言行为的影响机制研究——基于员工追随力反向视角的研究框架[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,20(2):155-161
[10] 彭坚,王霄,冉雅璇,等.积极追随特质一定能提升工作产出吗——仁慈领导的激活作用[J].南开管理评论, 2016,19(4):135-146
[11] Barbara Kellerman. Followership:How Followers Are Creating Change and Changing Leaders[M]. Boston:Harvard Business Press, 2008
[12] Tee E. Y. J., Ashkanasy N. M., Paulsen N. Revisiting Followership through a Social Identity Perspective:The Role of Collective Follower Emotion and Action[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2013,24(6):902-918
[13] Hogg M. A. A Social Identity Theory of Leadership[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2001,5(3):184-200
[14] Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. From Micro to Meso:Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2000,3(3):211-236
[15] Carsten M. K., Uhl-Bien M., West B. J., et al. Exploring Social Constructions of Followership:A Qualitative Study[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2010,21(3):543-562
[16] Meindl J. R. The Romance of Leadership as a Follower-centric Theory:A Social Constructionist Approach[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995,6(3):329-341
[17] Hoffman B. J., Woehr D. J. A Quantitative Review of the Relationship Between Person-Organization Fit and Behavioral Outcomes[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2005,68(3):389-399
[18] Klimoski R., Mohammed S. Team Mental Model Construct of Metaphor[J]. Journal of Management, 1994,20(2):403-437
[19] Chen X., Lam S., Naumann S., et al. Group Organizational Behavior:Conceptualization and Preliminary Test of Its Antecedents and Consequences[J]. Management&Organization Review, 2005,1(2):273-300
[20] 程建君,董睿岫.国外团队凝聚力研究述评[J].社会心理科学, 2014,29(7):21-24
[21] Jehn K. A., Bezrukova K. A Field Study of Group Diversity, Workgroup Context, and Performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2003,25(6):703-729
[22] 陈晓萍,沈伟.组织与管理研究的实证方法(第三版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2018
[23] Hogg M. A., Abrams D. Social Identifications:A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes[M]. London:Routledge, 1988
[24] 斯蒂芬·P.罗宾斯,玛丽·库尔特.管理学(第12版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2018
[25] 宋官东.对从众行为的再认识[J].心理科学, 2002,25(2):202-204
[26] Fairfield D. Empowered Followership[J]. Marine Corps Gazette, 2007,(91):54
[27] 贾旭东,谭新辉.经典扎根理论及其精神对中国管理研究的现实价值[J].管理学报, 2010,7(5):656-665
[28] Kathy C. Constructing Grounded Theory[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publication, 2006
[29] 潘绥铭,姚星亮,黄盈盈.论定性调查的人数问题:是"代表性"还是"代表什么"的问题——最大差异的信息饱和法及其方法论意义[J].社会科学研究, 2010,(4):108-105
[30] Morgeson F., DeRue D. S., Karam E. P. Leadership in Teams:A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes[J]. Journal of Management, 2010,36(1):5-39
[31] 陈向明.质性研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社, 2000
[32] Sy T. What do You Think of Followers?Examining the Content, Structure, and Consequences of Implicit Followership Theories[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010,113(2):73-84
[33] Glaser B. G. Theoretical Sensitivity[M]. MillValley, CA:Sociology Press, 1978
[34] Borman W. C., Motowidlo S. J. Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance[A]. In:Schmitt N., Borman W. C., Eds., Personnel Selection in Organizations[C]. San Francissa CA:Jossey Bass, 1993
[35] Van Scotter J. P., Motowidlo S. J. Interpersonal Facilitation and Job Dedication as Separate Facets of Contextual Performance[J]. Jouranl of Applied Psychology, 1996,81(5):525-531
[36] 李敏,陈胜军.周边绩效理论综述[J].人力资源管理, 2012,(2):32-35
[37] 赵慧军,席艳平.员工追随行为结构验证及其对工作绩效的影响[J].中国人力资源开发, 2015,(15):40-47
[38] Salas E., Dickinson T. L., Converse S. A., et al. Toward an Understanding of Team Performance and Training[A]. In R. W. Swezey&Salas (Eds.), Teams:Their Training and Performance[C]. Westport, CT:Ablex, 1992
[39] 曹元坤,许晟.部属追随力:概念界定与量表开发[J].当代财经, 2013,(3):82-89
[40] 周文杰,宋继文,李浩澜.中国情境下追随力的内涵、结构与测量[J].管理学报, 2015,12(3):355-363
[41] Ehrhart M. G., Naumann S. E. Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Work Groups:A Group Norms Approach[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004,89(6):960-974
[42] 赵菊,佐斌.情境与互动:人际互倚及其模式[J].心理科学进展, 2005,13(6):828-835
[43] Rusbult C. E., Van Lange P. A. M. Interdependence, Interaction, and Relationships[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003,54(1):351-375
[44] 汪曲.团队内关系格局与建言行为——基于内隐建言信念的实证探索[J].软科学, 2015,29(12):96-101
[45] Broemer P., Diehl M. What You Think Is What You Get:Comparative Evaluations of Close Relationships[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003,29(12):1560-1569
[46] 张志学.组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论[J].心理学报, 2010,42(1):10-21
[47] Hackman J. R. Group Influences on Individuals in Organizations[A]. In M. D. Dunnette&L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology[C]. Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992
[48] 刘冰,谢凤涛,孟庆春.团队氛围对团队绩效影响机制的实证分析[J].中国软科学, 2011,(11):133-140
[49] Scott S. G., Bruce R. Creating Innovative Behavior among R&D Professionals:The Moderating Effect of Leadership on the Relationship between Problem-solving Style and Innovation[M]. Dayton North:IEEE, 1994
[50] Thibaut J. W., Kelley H. H. The Social Psychology of Groups[M]. New York:Wiley, 1959
[51] 罗文豪.追随研究的历史溯源、现实驱力与未来展望[J].中国人力资源开发, 2015,(15):6-15
[52] 乔雪.论团队领导力的开发[J].东华大学学报(社会科学版), 2012,12(2):149-152

基于扎根理论的团队追随研究：内涵、结构与形成机制

A Research on Team Followership Based on Grounded Theory: Definition, Structure and Formation Mechanism

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王炳成, 赵静怡, 杨珍花. 社交新零售商业模式情境下消费者认同路径研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(8): 198-208.
[2]	马文璇, 温馨, 徐剑. 事故灾难区域性应急物流体系构成要素的甄别及作用关系模型研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(6): 311-322.
[3]	林海芬, 刘宏双, 刘相彤. 悖论思维的概念界定及结构模型[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(4): 339-352.
[4]	刘鲁川, 刘承林. 电商直播对消费者购买意向的影响——基于扎根理论的研究[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(12): 182-189.
[5]	石冠峰, 文梅, 方志斌, 牛宇霖, 唐杰. 基于扎根理论的中国员工错失焦虑研究:内涵、结构及形成机制[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(5): 176-187.
[6]	孙建军, 王树祥, 苏志文, 王征. 双元创新价值链模型构建:基于扎根理论的企业创新模式研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(5): 340-352.
[7]	马贵梅, 马红, 张旭, 马冰, 袁明月. 基于扎根理论的员工建言质量研究:内容结构、测量与作用机制[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(12): 227-240.
[8]	贾建锋, 牛雪妍, 赵若男, 李志刚. 魅力型领导对追随力的影响：一个被调节的中介模型[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(6): 181-191.
[9]	蒋国银, 陈玉凤, 蔡兴顺, 张美娟. 平台事件网络舆情传播的影响因素与治理策略研究：基于WSR的扎根分析[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(5): 184-193.
[10]	吴荻, 刘慧, 王恩旭, 匡海波. 基于扎根理论的旅游舆情形成机制研究——心理契约违背视角[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(4): 170-179.
[11]	周青, 吴童祯, 杨伟, 方刚. 面向“一带一路”的企业技术标准联盟模式研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(2): 108-119.
[12]	田志龙, 陈丽玲, Taieb Hafsi, 顾佳林. 我国四级政府创新政策体系下的企业响应策略与行动：基于扎根理论的多案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(12): 87-99.
[13]	尚晏莹, 蒋军锋. 工业互联网时代的传统制造企业商业模式创新路径[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(10): 130-144.
[14]	李志刚, 黄灿, 徐文明, 吴凡. 裂变新创企业邻近选址类型划分及其与外部环境的匹配关系——基于扎根理论方法的探索[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(8): 91-105.
[15]	王炳成, 闫晓飞, 张士强, 饶卫振, 曾丽君. 商业模式创新过程构建与机理：基于扎根理论的研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(6): 127-137.